gasilsquared.blogg.se

Photoscore ultimate vs lite
Photoscore ultimate vs lite




photoscore ultimate vs lite

Multifunctional: The ruggedness of CCF, combined with the ease of access that comes with strapping a pad to the outside of a pack, make these pads convenient to whip out for trailside comfort throughout the day. There are lighter pads out there that even boast higher R-values, such as the NeoAir XLite and UberLite, but those risk quickly turn to deadweight when punctured.Īnd for shorter hikers or gram-weenies, shortening these CCF pads is an easy way to shave off a few ounces-a difficult, albeit possible, option with inflatables. Lightweight: At just under one pound, the Z Lite and Switchback qualify as “ultralight” sleeping pads. The Z Lite and Switchback each cost less than $50 and will save you $100-$200 versus popular inflatable options like the NeoAir XLite.Īnd again, CCF can’t pop, so you can be sure that your modest investment will be around for the long haul. Inexpensive: CCF sleeping pads are the cheapest available.

photoscore ultimate vs lite

This is why I choose the word “rugged” instead of “durable”. With extended use, the foam will compress, the comfort-giving dimples will flatten, and the heat-reflecting shine will dull. The comfort might not be top-notch, but it is reliable. Rugged: Compared with inflatable sleeping pads, which become unreliable or totally useless with a pinhole leak, CCF pads can take abuse without degrading performance. Closed-cell foam pads are great for any occasion, including this on-trail wedding in the Winds.






Photoscore ultimate vs lite